Internally reviewed manuscript (Paper Close)
Internally reviewed and publicly released. Complete formalization of the principal conclusions is not yet established; errors may remain.
The flagship mathematics programme at Crab Research. Proof Engine develops reliable AI-assisted mathematical research through precise statements, readable arguments, and reproducible proof evidence.
Formal verification expresses a theorem and its proof in a form a proof assistant can check. The categories below explain which checks are complete and which assumptions remain.
Internally reviewed and publicly released. Complete formalization of the principal conclusions is not yet established; errors may remain.
Some cited theorems are stated as explicit assumptions. The proof assistant checks the remaining argument conditional on them; their proofs are not yet included in the released package.
The proof assistant checks every theorem dependency, including cited results, without additional theorem assumptions. Only foundational axioms, the starting principles listed here, are allowed. We also check correspondence to the paper; exposition may still need correction.
propext (Propositional extensionality); Classical.choice (Classical choice); Quot.sound (Quotient soundness).
Accepted by a journal or peer-reviewed proceedings after independent review. This records external scholarly acceptance; acceptance and formal publication are recorded separately.
Kernel-Only is our only accepted final formalization standard. Reference-Gated has lower assurance and is released only as an intermediate milestone when the engineering effort is exceptionally large. Peer review does not remove a remaining theorem assumption.
Cited results must have precise statements, sources and corresponding checked formal theorems. Existing kernel-checked Lean/mathlib proofs may be reused. All dependencies must ultimately reduce to propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; extra theorem axioms, sorry and unchecked native-computation shortcuts are excluded.
A Reference-Gated release must publish its gate manifest: exact statements, hypotheses and quantifiers, source locations, formal assumptions and the conclusions that depend on them. Reaching Kernel-Only requires eliminating every gate through checked proofs and rechecking the final endpoint and paper correspondence.
The endpoint axiom report identifies what the proof actually depends on. Its statement must still be checked against the intended mathematical theorem; an axiom report alone does not establish that correspondence.
SSRN Working Papers present developed research. Some are maintained as standalone working papers by design. Research maturity and publication status are recorded separately.
16 results · Academic publication first · record updated 2026-09-06
A height-gap classification and product structure for Boolean antichains, with matroid and lattice applications.
Enumeration for every alphabet size, highest-weight refinements, and fixed-rank asymptotics for ballot-admissible Fibonacci ribbon tableaux.
Propp’s Problem 6, finite-defect path models, and complete generating functions on the first defect diagonal.
Lagrange-value collisions, cover relations, band-fibre structure, and exact minimal examples in rational Dyck path orders.
The exact extremal bound for every N in Erdős Problem 848, including the finite range and infinite tail.
A complete classification of Hamilton cycles and paths in the noncrossing partition refinement graph, with uniform constructions and parity obstructions.
The b^k pattern, finite computational evidence, and a threshold conjecture. This preprint does not claim closure of the full Rado programme.
A uniform, classification-free proof of the known strict factor-two root-polytope projection theorem, with a rootwise bound.
A permutation grid with exactly 155 complete rook placements, disproving Lewis–Won Conjecture 3.10, with counterexamples in every order at least eight.
An explicit collar construction proves sufficiency for type-013 benzel tileability in Propp’s Problem 4. Full enumeration remains open.
These working papers include early ideas, initial drafts, and work awaiting further development or verification. They are shared as work in progress.
A Catalan-forest decomposition proving the conjectured fixed-point distance formula, with joint position and excedance counts and distance distributions under symmetry.
A reflected Newton transform, its symmetric concave image and coefficientwise inequalities, with applications to two peak-polynomial coefficient questions.
A constructive inverse theory for symmetric tropical characteristic polynomials. The human proof is complete; formalization is in progress.
The analytic cone-walk companion: probabilistic, harmonic, and spectral geometry. Full formal verification of the paper remains in progress.
Rigidity, descent formulas, and global Wilf classification for canon permutations. The current public manuscript predates the completed formal package.
For integers b ≥ 2 and k ≥ 1, the multicolor Rado number R_k(b) for the equation x + by = bz is the least positive integer n such that every k-coloring of {1, ..., n} contains a monochromatic solution.
Complementary layers of mathematical research: 1.0 organizes proof development; 2.0 governs the mathematical investigation and can use 1.0 within it.
Composes exact claims, evidence and dependencies; keeps proof obligations explicit and propagates corrections through the argument.
Read the paper · SSRN 7237460Governs the question, intended contribution and evidence needed for a mathematical investigation. Autonomous execution remains within human-approved scope.
Read the paper · Zenodo Working PaperAI is accelerating the production of mathematical content. We use engineering methods to make rapid production trustworthy and its results understandable and reusable.
Read the research agendaSSRN Working Papers present developed research. Some are maintained as standalone working papers by design. Research maturity and publication status are recorded separately.
4 papers · Academic publication first · record updated 2026-09-06
A methodological account of statement correspondence, evidence, and the engineering surrounding kernel verification.
A claim-graph method for accountable AI-assisted mathematical research; the public technical description of Proof Engine 1.0.
Companion case study in the Proof Engine programme: worked Hamilton and Rado audits of claim-level evidence, checking boundaries and residual dependencies. The flagship Proof Engine Infrastructure paper develops the general methodology.
A complementary project-level method for source inquiry, existing-solution checks, statement correspondence, and the governance of changing mathematical objectives.